[WikiEN-l] Proposal re gramer and speling

[Mark Richards]

Yes, it would be most use to articles that don't get
much attention, but then, I am guessing that ones that
do get more action get checked more. It's the ones
that noone ever sees that concern me most. The edit
history would show whether there were major changes
since a check. Can anyone who is more conversant with
how the categories (or another system) work suggest a
way to trial this that wouldn't annoy people?

--- Charles Matthews <charles.r.matthews at ntlworld.com>
wrote:
> Mark Richards wrote
> 
> > I agree - is there any way that we could use
> markers
> > or categories (maybe on the talk page) to
> 'certify'
> > that articles have been checked by someone for g
> and
> > s?
> 
> There seems to be plenty of flexibility in the
> category system for 'rating
> usages'.  The page history would show up edits
> subsequent to any 'rating'.
> Of course this is most useful on pages that are
> rarely edited.  Which will
> in many cases be those that are _least_ read.  I
> don't know how practical it
> would be to institute a drive to spread this all
> over WP.  The basic
> categories are not propagating so very rapidly, IMX.
> 
> Charles
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> WikiEN-l mailing list
> WikiEN-l at Wikipedia.org
> http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
> 



		
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Get it on your mobile phone.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/maildemo