[WikiEN-l] Re: Plautus

[Anthere]

Oh, in case that was unclear, I have no problem with Lir myself. I 
rather like her :-)


Anthere a écrit:
> 
> 
> Martin Harper a écrit:
> 
>> Arno M wrote:
>>
>>> When will something be done?
>>
>>
>>
>> Brian Corr wrote:
>>
>>> Could someone give an update on a timeline for action?
>>
>>
>>
>> Something will be done about Plautus when you do something about 
>> Plautus. The timeline for action on Plautus is roughly:
>> 1) You decide to act.
>> 2) You act.
> 
> 
> I liked your answer
> But...I have another question
> 
> Some people think that something should be done about Lir.
> 
> Question they ask : When will something be done ?
> 
> 
> 
> Answer they received from UserA :
> * There is no problem with user Lir. So, you have no problem
> 
> ====> Answer of the type : your opinion is irrelevant
> 
> 
> 
> Answer they received from UserB :
> * We are busy thinking about the matter. Please be patient, do not do 
> anything, we'll fix the problem for you, that is our job
> 
> ====> Answer of the type : please, hold on, you are not in charge, we 
> are in charge. Go back to your own business
> 
> 
> ---------
> 
> Still, nothing happen
> 
> ---------
> 
> 
> What they do
> 1) They decide to act.
> 2) They act.
> 
> Answer they received from UserC
> * Your action was incorrect. You are out of the game. Next time, refer 
> to suggestion of UserB instead of trying to decide and act by yourself.
> 
> 
> -------
> 
> Comment from Anthere
> 
> When general guidelines are inconsistant, and that half of people say 
> ''you are in charge, take charge'' and the half say ''do not do 
> anything, those who have responsability here will take care of the 
> matter for you'', is there proper consistancy in our message ?
> 
> The vaccum cleaner hole is more than a hole.
> People just do not know, whether they should refer to a group of user 
> from now on to fix their problems
> Or if they should manage to deal with problems themselves
> 
> -------
> 
> So, yes, that is a good answer, but at least people from the arbitration 
> committee should be consistant in their answer, to those of us who are 
> wondering what action power we still hold. At least, to know whether 
> your answer, Martin, is the correct one, or the incorrect one.
> 
> (I can have my own answer, but I suppose I would be the one to find 
> myself in front of arbitration if I applied it, so will I dare ?)