[WikiEN-l] I propose a formula based on reverts
Fred Bauder
fredbaud at ctelco.net
Tue Feb 3 15:35:10 UTC 2004
No, Ed, You're proposing giving power to a set of troublemakers. Many good
editors are frequently reverted if they attempt to edit hot-button issues.
As far a counting Admins, we have seldom been able to prevent elevation to
sysop status of people who regularly edit from a controversial POV.
Fred
> From: "Poor, Edmund W" <Edmund.W.Poor at abc.com>
> Reply-To: English Wikipedia <wikien-l at Wikipedia.org>
> Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2004 10:16:53 -0500
> To: "English Wikipedia" <wikien-l at Wikipedia.org>
> Subject: RE: [WikiEN-l] I propose a formula based on reverts
>
> Theresa wrote:
>
>> I agree, what to stop someone from following you
>> around anh reverting everything you do?
>
> The formula I propose, takes that into account.
>
> We should track the number of a contributors edits that are reverted,
> divided into:
>
> * reverted by admins
> * reverted by ordinary folk
> * reverted by suspected troublemakers
>
> Additionally, we should track reversions MADE BY EACH USER. So anyone
> who makes trouble by following around a "good" user and reverts all
> their edits would be quickly tagged as a "reverts for no good reason"
> user.
>
> Ed Poor, aka Uncle Ed
> _______________________________________________
> WikiEN-l mailing list
> WikiEN-l at Wikipedia.org
> http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
More information about the WikiEN-l
mailing list