[WikiEN-l] Re: Viking ban

[Daniel Ehrenberg]

I thought Triton was BW... I'm confused.
--LittleDan

Dante Alighieri <dalighieri at digitalgrapefruit.com> wrote:
(resubmission, submitted before under improper email profile)

Just a little note.

In the interest of fairness I wanted to state that it may not be strictly true that no one objects to the ban on User:Viking. I believe User:Triton may. The following is from Triton on my Talk page (now archived at User Talk:Dante Alighieri/clovis et al.):

Take a look now at the new way of humiliating a user. A new file has been made called User talk:Viking/ban that will keep showing up on the Recent Changes list as many times as their attacker(s) wish. When someone not involved sees that, what is the impression of UserViking?

Now, I don't know for CERTAIN that this means Triton objects to the ban, but I certainly would want to give Triton the chance to clarify himself. I wouldn't want his comments to go unheard and risk us banning Viking without giving anyone who cares to defend him a chance to do so. 

Let's not ban Viking until we give Triton a clear chance to voice himself. I would hate for Triton to go unheard.



-----

Dante Alighieri
dalighieri at digitalgrapefruit.com


---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Free online calendar with sync to Outlook(TM).
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/attachments/20030530/d1dbb359/attachment.htm