[WikiEN-l] Michael

[Stevertigo]

> In principle I'm all for a ban, but in practice I don't think it will
> achieve anything. He'll only come back under different IP numbers (as he
> has done before) and make similar edits. It's better not to ban him so as
> to keep all his edits under the one name. They're easier to check and edit
> or revert that way, rather than them being spread out over a dozens of
> different IP numbers. As it is, he sometimes edits while not signed in,
but
> only rarely.
>
> At the same time, I don't think we should bother ourselves too much about
> trying to talk to him, explain things to him and that sort of thing. We've
> done enough of that already and we've just been sworn at and had our
> comments deleted.

> What we should do about the questionable details he's been adding about
> album release dates, Grammy winners and that sort of thing (whether we
> should remove them all because some have been shown to be incorrect, or
> keep them until they are proven to be wrong even though they're not very
> easy things to check), I don't know.

Hm. Anything not easily verifyable, perhaps even track times, etc, should be
reverted, I think. Ive checked a few of his 'facts' before, and they were
ok... What I really want to do with this eleven year old is call up his
Mommy and get him busted. -SV