[Toolserver-l] Better toolserver status?

[Marcin Cieslak]

>> Daniel Schwen <lists at schwen.de> wrote:
>> announce. I think it is clear that we than have other things to do then
>> writing long texts ;-).
>
> No, that is not clear _at all_. I realize the importance of toolserver
> maintenance. But let's face it, you guys are providing the
> infrastructure FOR THE TOOLS. 

What about using http://nagios.toolserver.org/ instead of the status
webpage that has to be updated manually? Sure, it's not as readable
as a plain text description, but maybe if hosts/services are
described in a bit more verbose way it would work better?

//Saper