We can always post both of them over the course of the coming week and see which one does better. ;-) Thanks, James!
--Ed
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 5:02 PM, James Alexander jalexander@wikimedia.org wrote:
Great read, I need to go through the articles themselves later! SM comments in line
James Alexander Community Advocacy Wikimedia Foundation (415) 839-6885 x6716 @jamesofur
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Joe Sutherland <jsutherland@wikimedia.org
wrote:
Hey all,
We just published "Wikipedia Picks: a ‘bad-boy’ bishop and expensive tulips" to the blog. URL:
https://blog.wikimedia.org/2015/07/27/bad-bishop-and-expensive-tulips/
Many thanks to Ed and Victoria for this post.
Below are some proposed social media messages. Please tweak as needed.
*Twitter (@wikipedia/@wikimedia):* • "This is the epitome of a bad-boy bishop." • Monroe Edwards was a modern-day Catch Me If You Can, albeit much less successful. • Han van Meegeren once sold a forged painting to a Nazi high official. • That time when they paid thousands for a single tulip bulb. • How much would you pay for a tulip bulb?
I think these are all fine to post, my favorite is the last 2 about the Tulip and a couple suggestion (in addition not as adjustments) below (obviously biased about my own):
- Han van Meegeren's forgeries became collectables themselves [I love
this part, think it has a bit more 'pop' then just that he sold them to the Nazi's.
*Facebook/Google+:*
• "This is the epitome of a bad-boy bishop." • Monroe Edwards was a modern-day Catch Me If You Can, albeit much less successful. • Han van Meegeren once sold a forged painting to a Nazi high official. • That time when they paid thousands for a single tulip bulb. • How much would you pay for a tulip bulb?
thanks, Joe
Same, LGTM and I'd add the one above as an option.
Social-media mailing list Social-media@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media