Haiyi,
This study sounds like it would be relevant if submitted to the Wikimedia
Research
). I think
this should be an excellent venue for feedback, and if things go well, a
go-ahead/endorsement from the committee. You'll have to create a project
page (see the form on
) and then let
me know when you are ready for review and I can get the ball rolling.
The review is relatively unstructured and consists primarily of questions
and requests raised on the talk page.
Let me know if you have questions.
-Aaron
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 12:13 AM, Haiyi Zhu <haiyiz(a)cs.cmu.edu> wrote:
Hi Aaron,
This is Haiyi Zhu from Carnegie Mellon University. I am working with Bob
Kraut and Niki Kittur. I read your work about the effects of revert in
Wikipedia. That is very interesting. Also congratulations on getting the
summer intern job in Wikipedia.
We have been planning on conducting an experiment to investigate the
effects of messages on participation in Wikipedia. We are wondering if there
is any appropriate place in Wikipedia website for us to post our plan of
experiments and get feedback from Wikipedia foundations and experienced
Wikipedians. It would be really helpful if you could point us to the right
place.
I also attach the details of our experiments.
Thanks for your help!
Haiyi
1. Purpose of the study
Wikipedia is one of the most successful examples of social production
online, and the key components to its continued success is maintaining a
large number of contributions made by a large and diverse community of
editors. The quality of Wikipedia articles is also maintained by its
community of editors through shared leadership behaviors, which are
leadership behaviors that come from all members at all levels (e.g. all
Wikipedia users), not only members in a defined leadership position (e.g.
Wikipedia administrators). Shared leadership behaviors in Wikipedia include,
but are not limited to, giving positive comments to a contributor for
creating a well-written new article (positive task-based message),
criticisms or reprimands to a contributor for not complying to Wikipedia
guidelines (negative task-based message), giving directions to correct an
error (directive task-based message). All of these aforementioned messages
could be written in a manner that is sociable and person-focused--friendly,
supportive and caring, and seeks to retain relationships with others, or not
sociable. Past research has shown that person-focused leadership was
effective in motivating users to contribute more, while negative messages
lead to decrease in motivation (Effectiveness of Shared Leadership, CSCW,
2012, under review,
http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~haiyiz/ttt/SharedLeadership_fifthpdf.pdf).
Therefore, we are interested in learning how task-based messages (positive,
negative, directive) with a sociable(person-focused) component would effect
Wikipedia users' contributions.
We will test how receiving the different types of messages (positive
task-based, negative task-based, or directive message) with and without a
sociable component, as well as the recipient's level of experience will
influence a recipient's future contributions to Wikipedia. We will do so by
having researchers post messages on the recipients' Wikipedia User Talk
page, and then we will track the recipients' level of contribution over
time.
2. Research procedures:
The research procedure will not require any extra effort and activity by
the participants, other than their usual participation on Wikipedia. The
time period of this experiment will take place from July 1st to August. The
location will take place online on the Wikipedia website.
We will be posting experimentally altered messages to the participants'
Wikipedia User Talk page, which is public and can be seen by anyone. The
experiment researchers will identify a list of newly created articles that
are two to ten days old. We will only post a response to a newly-created
article that is at least two days old, in accordance to Wikipedia's policy
of "don't bite the newcomers" (
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:BITE).
We will then categorize the new articles as containing errors or not
containing errors according to a set of criteria determined by Wikipedia
guidelines. The creator of the new article containing errors would randomly
be assigned to receive a positive task-based message, negative task-based
message, directive message, or non task-based message, and each type of
message would also be randomly assigned to be sociable or not sociable. The
same assignment procedure will be given to the creator of an article without
errors, with the exclusion of negative task-based feedback.
Also, all messages sent by the experimenter will be prepared beforehand
in templates (see the section 4) , which are designed to mimic messages sent
by other Wikipedia users, and therefore the risk associated with these
messages are no greater than the risks experienced by a Wikipedia user
during everyday interactions on Wikipedia. We will then extract the users'
activity data after one to two weeks in order to examine the users level of
contribution; we will also extract some user info, such as date of first
edit, in order to assess the recipients' level of experience. However, no
personal information that could be used to identify the identity of the
recipient will be extracted, used, or recorded in this experiment.
3. We need your help!
If you are interested in our research project and would like to
participate in our experiment and send out messages, please sign here.
4. Appendix: example messages
4.1 Each message has some base, non-task focused/non-social content.
I see you created the new article [[“{{{{contrib}}}}]]. New articles are
typically reviewed by users on the [[Wikipedia:New_pages_patrol|‘New Article
Patrol’]]. If your article has not been reviewed, it should happen soon.
Thank you, ~~~~
I see that you recently created the new article [[“{{{{contrib}}}}]]. As
you know, Wikipedia is always a [work in progress]. So thank you, ~~~~
I see that you recently created the new article [[contrib]]. It would
probably fit into project [[Project]]. (although a good suggestion, this
message is not yet compatible with the various categories,
4.2. The social messages have social content in the salutation before the
base message and in the closing after the base message:
Salutations:
Happy Monday, {{SUBST:BASEPAGENAME}}!
Greetings {{SUBST:BASEPAGENAME}}!
Hi {{SUBST:BASEPAGENAME}}!
Welcome {{SUBST:BASEPAGENAME}}! (new users only)
Closing:
Happy editing! Hope your day is going well and you are having fun. ~~~
It’s nice to see you editing! Hope you’ll stick around! ~~~~
Have a fun and productive day! Cheers, ~~~~
Let me know if there is any way I can help. Hope you sill stick around.
Thanks, Amy ~~~~
Let me know if I can be of any help and I’ll do my best! ~~~~
4.3. The positive feedback message includes some general positive comment
and an article specific comment
General: This article looks very well put together. [ Point to a specific
praiseworthy element , based on article content.]
Specific:
The image greatly improves the article.
The citations and references seem to abide to Wikipedia’s referencing
guidelines.
There is a good number of citations and references.
The content seems pretty substantial for a new article.
The content seems well-organized.
The information is presented clearly and is easy to understand.
The layout of the article makes it very clear.
The headings and sections seem appropriate.
4.4. The negative feedback message includes some general negative comment
and an article specific comment
General: However, I noticed the article contains errors. [Point to a
specific error, based on article content.]
Specific:
The article contains spelling/grammatical error’s (specifics)
The article currently does not contain any [[WP:REF|references]].
The article’s image currently does not contain any captions.
The references in the article do not follow Wikipedia guidelines. There
is a tutorial on formatting citations at [[Wikipedia:Referencing]]
The article does not contain any [[Help:Link|Wikilinks]], and so doesn’t
follow [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style (linking)|Wikipedia style guidelines]].
The article does not contain in-line citations, and so doesn’t follow
[[WP:REF|Wikipedia style guidelines]].
The article is confusing. I do not understand what you are trying to
say.
The article’s footer sections are not in the [[WP:FOOTER|standard
order]].
4.5. The directive message asks the editor to do a specific comment on
an article related to the one they created.
Other sample tasks:
It would be great if you could also improve the related article __.
It would be great if you could also [[Help:Files|upload a picture]] for
the related article__.
It would be great if you could also [[WP:REF|add references]] to the
related article __.
It would be great if you could also create new articles for [the red
links that do not lead to another article yet].
It would be great if you could also [[Talk:__|give feedback]] for the
related article __.
It would be great if you could also clean-up the related article __.
It would be great if you could also [[WP:MOS|Wikify]] the related article
__.
It would be great if you could also help merge the related article __.
It would be great if you could also participate in the [discussion] about
deleting __.