[QA] Reg::RSpec matchers

[jagori samajdar]

Thanks Dan,yup I was reading that only now:)


On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 10:39 AM, Dan Duvall <dduvall at wikimedia.org> wrote:

> Got it! I was confused about what you were confused about then. :)
>
> If you're still wondering about the absence of `be_visible` in the RSpec
> documentation, do check out the link to predicate matchers I posted.[1]
>
>
> https://www.relishapp.com/rspec/rspec-expectations/v/3-0/docs/built-in-matchers/predicate-matchers
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 5:01 PM, jagori samajdar <jagori79 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks Dan,I understand and am aware of that.
>>
>> It was just for my knowledge and understanding.Since am pretty new to
>> Ruby and Watir-Webdriver,so am trying to learn whatever things I come
>> across while making the changes.
>>
>> Thanks ,
>> Jagori
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 3:12 AM, Dan Duvall <dduvall at wikimedia.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Just to clarify, AFAIK the predicate matcher
>>> <https://www.relishapp.com/rspec/rspec-expectations/v/3-0/docs/built-in-matchers/predicate-matchers>
>>> syntax has not changed, so there's no need to change `be_visible`. As
>>> Zeljko has illustrated, it's only the expectation syntax
>>> <https://www.relishapp.com/rspec/rspec-expectations/docs> that needs
>>> refactoring.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 1:07 AM, jagori samajdar <jagori79 at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thanks Zeljko for helping me out with the conversion part.I was
>>>> thinking , how to convert a single line statement like this:)
>>>>
>>>> But I still remain confused about the documentation.
>>>>
>>>> If anybody could provide any other documentation would be wonderful.
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> jagori
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 10:21 PM, Željko Filipin <
>>>> zfilipin at wikimedia.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 11:28 AM, jagori samajdar <jagori79 at gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> As part of my task wherein am converting the should syntax to
>>>>>> expect,am bit confused with the *be_visible* matcher or whatever it
>>>>>> is.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> For those of you that are not familiar with the bug, it is 66369[1].
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> I couldn't see it anywhere in the RSpec's default built in matcher
>>>>>> list.
>>>>>> https://github.com/rspec/rspec-expectations
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Can anyone help me understand the same as in the pasted code defined
>>>>>> in options_steps.rb:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Then(/^I should see the options overlay$/) do
>>>>>>   on(VisualEditorPage).options_page_title_element.when_present.should
>>>>>> be_visible
>>>>>> end
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> In this case, you have to convert
>>>>>
>>>>> on(VisualEditorPage).options_page_title_element.when_present.should
>>>>> be_visible
>>>>>
>>>>> to
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> expect((VisualEditorPage).options_page_title_element.when_present).to be_visible
>>>>>
>>>>> Let me know if you are still confused, or if you need more
>>>>> documentation. If anybody can point to better documentation than I have
>>>>> provided in the last e-mail message, please do.
>>>>>
>>>>> Željko
>>>>> --
>>>>> https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66369
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> QA mailing list
>>>>> QA at lists.wikimedia.org
>>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/qa
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> QA mailing list
>>>> QA at lists.wikimedia.org
>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/qa
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Dan Duvall
>>> Automation Engineer
>>> Wikimedia Foundation <http://wikimediafoundation.org>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> QA mailing list
>>> QA at lists.wikimedia.org
>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/qa
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> QA mailing list
>> QA at lists.wikimedia.org
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/qa
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Dan Duvall
> Automation Engineer
> Wikimedia Foundation <http://wikimediafoundation.org>
>
> _______________________________________________
> QA mailing list
> QA at lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/qa
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/qa/attachments/20140716/29a57cd1/attachment.html>