[QA] Reg::RSpec matchers
Dan Duvall
dduvall at wikimedia.org
Wed Jul 16 00:39:52 UTC 2014
Got it! I was confused about what you were confused about then. :)
If you're still wondering about the absence of `be_visible` in the RSpec
documentation, do check out the link to predicate matchers I posted.[1]
https://www.relishapp.com/rspec/rspec-expectations/v/3-0/docs/built-in-matchers/predicate-matchers
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 5:01 PM, jagori samajdar <jagori79 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks Dan,I understand and am aware of that.
>
> It was just for my knowledge and understanding.Since am pretty new to Ruby
> and Watir-Webdriver,so am trying to learn whatever things I come across
> while making the changes.
>
> Thanks ,
> Jagori
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 3:12 AM, Dan Duvall <dduvall at wikimedia.org> wrote:
>
>> Just to clarify, AFAIK the predicate matcher
>> <https://www.relishapp.com/rspec/rspec-expectations/v/3-0/docs/built-in-matchers/predicate-matchers>
>> syntax has not changed, so there's no need to change `be_visible`. As
>> Zeljko has illustrated, it's only the expectation syntax
>> <https://www.relishapp.com/rspec/rspec-expectations/docs> that needs
>> refactoring.
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 1:07 AM, jagori samajdar <jagori79 at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks Zeljko for helping me out with the conversion part.I was thinking
>>> , how to convert a single line statement like this:)
>>>
>>> But I still remain confused about the documentation.
>>>
>>> If anybody could provide any other documentation would be wonderful.
>>> Thanks,
>>> jagori
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 10:21 PM, Željko Filipin <zfilipin at wikimedia.org
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 11:28 AM, jagori samajdar <jagori79 at gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> As part of my task wherein am converting the should syntax to
>>>>> expect,am bit confused with the *be_visible* matcher or whatever it
>>>>> is.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> For those of you that are not familiar with the bug, it is 66369[1].
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> I couldn't see it anywhere in the RSpec's default built in matcher
>>>>> list.
>>>>> https://github.com/rspec/rspec-expectations
>>>>>
>>>>> Can anyone help me understand the same as in the pasted code defined
>>>>> in options_steps.rb:
>>>>>
>>>>> Then(/^I should see the options overlay$/) do
>>>>> on(VisualEditorPage).options_page_title_element.when_present.should
>>>>> be_visible
>>>>> end
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> In this case, you have to convert
>>>>
>>>> on(VisualEditorPage).options_page_title_element.when_present.should
>>>> be_visible
>>>>
>>>> to
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> expect((VisualEditorPage).options_page_title_element.when_present).to be_visible
>>>>
>>>> Let me know if you are still confused, or if you need more
>>>> documentation. If anybody can point to better documentation than I have
>>>> provided in the last e-mail message, please do.
>>>>
>>>> Željko
>>>> --
>>>> https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66369
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> QA mailing list
>>>> QA at lists.wikimedia.org
>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/qa
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> QA mailing list
>>> QA at lists.wikimedia.org
>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/qa
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Dan Duvall
>> Automation Engineer
>> Wikimedia Foundation <http://wikimediafoundation.org>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> QA mailing list
>> QA at lists.wikimedia.org
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/qa
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> QA mailing list
> QA at lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/qa
>
>
--
Dan Duvall
Automation Engineer
Wikimedia Foundation <http://wikimediafoundation.org>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/qa/attachments/20140715/0cab8651/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the QA
mailing list