[QA] Reg::RSpec matchers

[jagori samajdar]

Thanks Zeljko for helping me out with the conversion part.I was thinking ,
how to convert a single line statement like this:)

But I still remain confused about the documentation.

If anybody could provide any other documentation would be wonderful.
Thanks,
jagori


On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 10:21 PM, Željko Filipin <zfilipin at wikimedia.org>
wrote:

> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 11:28 AM, jagori samajdar <jagori79 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> As part of my task wherein am converting the should syntax to expect,am
>> bit confused with the *be_visible* matcher or whatever it is.
>>
>
> For those of you that are not familiar with the bug, it is 66369[1].
>
>
>> I couldn't see it anywhere in the RSpec's default built in matcher list.
>> https://github.com/rspec/rspec-expectations
>>
>> Can anyone help me understand the same as in the pasted code defined in
>> options_steps.rb:
>>
>> Then(/^I should see the options overlay$/) do
>>   on(VisualEditorPage).options_page_title_element.when_present.should
>> be_visible
>> end
>>
>
> In this case, you have to convert
>
> on(VisualEditorPage).options_page_title_element.when_present.should
> be_visible
>
> to
>
>
> expect((VisualEditorPage).options_page_title_element.when_present).to be_visible
>
> Let me know if you are still confused, or if you need more documentation.
> If anybody can point to better documentation than I have provided in the
> last e-mail message, please do.
>
> Željko
> --
> https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66369
>
> _______________________________________________
> QA mailing list
> QA at lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/qa
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/qa/attachments/20140715/cd856755/attachment.html>