On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 2:16 PM, Neil Kandalgaonkar neilk@neilk.net wrote:
If you like, you can browse it on the web here.
https://git.wikimedia.org/tree/mediawiki%2Fextensions%2FUploadWizard
Or, you can just check my work. I attached a file with the output from a script I ran to find all the licenses.
Thanks! I also used Fossology to do a quick scan, and all it had were some false positives.[1] So I'm OK with the change of CREDITS to v2 or later.
And I'm OK with the use of the GPL v3 module.
Luis
[1] results: https://fossology.ist.unomaha.edu/?mod=nomoslicense&upload=518&item=... ; bug filed: http://www.fossology.org/issues/7263
On Thu Jul 10 13:35:26 2014, Luis Villa wrote:
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 12:09 PM, Gilles Dubuc <gilles@wikimedia.org mailto:gilles@wikimedia.org> wrote:
In that case, sounds like we should just correct the CREDITS file, since it's an inconsistency and was in contradiction with the actual code. Any objections?No objection to that change.
I would like to do a separate scan of the code to double-check on other problems - where does the UW code live?
Thanks- Luis
-- Luis Villa Deputy General Counsel Wikimedia Foundation 415.839.6885 ext. 6810
/This message may be confidential or legally privileged. If you have received it by accident, please delete it and let us know about the mistake. As an attorney for the Wikimedia Foundation, for legal/ethical reasons I cannot give legal advice to, or serve as a lawyer for, community members, volunteers, or staff members in their personal capacity. For more on what this means, please see our legal disclaimer <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Legal_Disclaimer ./
Multimedia mailing list Multimedia@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/multimedia
--
Neil Kandalgaonkar |) neilk@neilk.net