Google and wikis (was Re: [Mediawiki-l] logo only shows up on some pages)
martin_jambon at emailuser.net
Sun Feb 12 02:57:28 UTC 2006
On Sat, 11 Feb 2006, Gordon Mohr (@ Bitzi) wrote:
> Martin Jambon wrote:
>> On Fri, 10 Feb 2006, Matt Morgan wrote:
>>> Side note: I'm new to MediaWiki, but I'm having a really hard time
>>> googling for help. If I include "MediaWiki" in the search string, the
>>> results seem to return every third wiki out there, rather than help
>>> about MediaWiki. Any tips there?
>> I also noticed serious flaws in the Google results when searching for some
>> wikis. Google seems to have problems with the "wiki" keyword:
>> Shouldn't a search for `mediawiki wiki' (w/o quotes) return:
> It does, in position #12. And the higher results are mostly reasonable, too.
Mmmmh, I don't feel that's usual Google quality.
>> `mediawiki' alone works, so that's fine, but not expected.
> Their secret and proprietary ranking algorithms tell Google that people
> searching for [mediawiki wiki] should get the other results higher, as
> compared to plain [mediawiki] results. Tweaking the algorithms to do
> otherwise might help some cases, but hurt elsewhere. They're optimizing with
> regard to a lot of variables, so local anomalies aren't surprising. And can
> we be sure their ordering for [mediawiki wiki] isn't optimal for generating
> the most satisfied users (or most ad revenue)?
> Overall, they seem to be doing great ranking wikis and URLs/content with
> 'wiki' in them. There's no evidence of any 'flaw'.
Maybe it's just a sandbox effect on my site as you suggest.
I was suspecting that all links from blogs and wikis tagged with
rel=nofollow would have a bad effect on the ranking of these new
generation websites (as far as I understand it's a widespread practice
which is supposed to avoid Google bombing
>> I personally have a problem with the wiki I am running:
>> `bioinformatics wiki' should return some link to http://wikiomics.org in
>> the top ten Google results, if not first.
> How modest! :) You do appear somewhere around 60-70.
Come on, there are not 60 bioinformatics wikis!
Funny thing: I was about to say "come on, Google is not Altavista". So I
discovered that (1) Altavista still exists and (2) my site is ranked #2 on
Too bad nobody uses Altavista anymore.
> And, you are named in the 'snippet' shown for the #1 Google result, a
> Wikipedia page, perhaps helped by the way you bumped your site to the very
> top of the list of related links in an edit January 31st.
>> So I really don't know what I can do, I was used to much better results
>> from Google for my non-wiki pages, without forcing anything. Does anyone
>> have a similar experience? Any fix?
> It looks like your site is less than 3 months old. So step #1 would be: just
> wait. It takes a while -- sometimes 6 months or more -- before Google trusts
> new sites with a prominent ranking:
Very interesting, thank you. That matches exactly my symptoms.
> Separate from the sandbox effect: as your site gets deeper content, more
> organic links from diverse sites (not just backlinks you've pushed out
> yourself), and longer visits from happy users, you should also expect it to
> find its "true" higher level.
Martin Jambon, PhD
Visit http://wikiomics.org, the Bioinformatics Howto Wiki
More information about the MediaWiki-l