[Licom-l] Which GFDL?

[Samuel Klein]

I agree with Huib.

We are effectively making a statement about what licenses are good
for; I think that effect is stronger than the distributed minor
inconvenience of causing default GFDL upgrades.   The FSF is making
the same statement by having monotonically increasing license numbers
and having the 'default' GFDL url take you to the latest revision.
--SJ

On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 12:20 PM, Huib
Laurens<Abigor at forgotten-beauty.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I did some asking around to people on IRC or email, just people where I
> know that the are regular users on Wikimedia.
>
> The most people did say that the where expecting that Wikimedia is
> changing to gfdl-1.3. Therefor I think changing the license into
> Gfdl-1.2 with CC-by would make great confusion.
>
>
> But I don't have a strong opinion on both versions of the license.
>
> Huib
>
> _______________________________________________
> Licom-l mailing list
> Licom-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/licom-l
>