[Labs-l] Separate Icinga for Tool Labs

[Ryan Lane]

Yeah, that seems like a good idea. In general projects always have the
option on setting up more specific tools inside of their own project if the
general tool can't easily meet their needs.


On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 7:30 AM, Yuvi Panda <yuvipanda at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello!
>
> I know that we have some form of icinga for Labs in general, but it is
> currently pretty dysfunctional and not very useful. Wondering if we
> should setup a separate icinga just for toollabs that not just
> provides general monitoring for admins, but also monitoring for
> individual tools (in a way that's easily customizable by he tool
> authors themselves). I wrote up a proposal for this a while ago
> (https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Yuvipanda/Icinga_for_tools).
> I think this will help improve general reliability of all our tools
> and infrastructure.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> --
> Yuvi Panda T
> http://yuvi.in/blog
>
> _______________________________________________
> Labs-l mailing list
> Labs-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/labs-l
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/labs-l/attachments/20140530/f5e7201c/attachment.html>