[Labs-l] Accessing the databases from labs - A comparison with the toolserver

[Ryan Lane]

On Tuesday, July 16, 2013, Daniel Kinzler wrote:

> Am 12.07.2013 21:25, schrieb Marc A. Pelletier:
> > On 07/12/2013 03:26 PM, Platonides wrote:
> >> Except that we could have several IPs per cluster (as TS does).
> >
> > I'm pretty sure we have no plans to do that ever; if we ended up running
> > out of resources, it'd be much simpler to spin off some databases off to
> > a new server entirely than set up multiple replication with roundrobin.
>
> No redundancy for failover? You just trust the one instance to give us
> five nines?
>
>
Of course not. We don't even have that much of an uptime requirement for
production.

- Ryan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/labs-l/attachments/20130716/c75cc5e7/attachment.html>