[Labs-l] ram

[Ryan Lane]

Done. Named m1.xsmall.

On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 5:12 AM, Petr Bena <benapetr at gmail.com> wrote:
> OK, let me know when you create the 1gb ram, 10gb / and I would set up a
> bunch of web servers for deployment, because the current configuration we
> have is getting over loaded, or perhaps 512 mb ram, 5 gb / would be enough
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 6:31 PM, Ryan Lane <rlane32 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> A size between tiny and small would likely be good. The compute nodes
>> we are eventually moving to have some incredibly high amount of ram
>> though, so I don't think we should worry too much about it.
>>
>> The storage space I'm not too worried about. I'm more than happy with
>> us over allocating storage, as we can just track usage over time.
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On Jan 27, 2012, at 1:24 AM, Petr Bena <benapetr at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I have checked the instances and found out that we have approximately
>> > 50% of all allocated ram unused
>> >
>> > I think it would make sense to add 2 additional types:
>> >
>> > - with 1gb of ram and 10gb of storage mounted as /
>> > - with 2 gb of ram and 80gb or storage as /mnt and 10 gb of storage as /
>> >
>> > I think people should use tiny more, but current tiny is too small,
>> > especially storage is. What do you think? Maybe it would help us utilize
>> > resources better. There are too many instances which are not using even 10%
>> > of allocated space, most of them don't use /mnt at all
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Labs-l mailing list
>> > Labs-l at lists.wikimedia.org
>> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/labs-l
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Labs-l mailing list
>> Labs-l at lists.wikimedia.org
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/labs-l
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Labs-l mailing list
> Labs-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/labs-l
>