[Gendergap] Weird lame body fashion whatever website of the, day

[Sydney Poore]

I requested the name change for Boobies.jpg today, and was pleased to see
that Mattbuck did it quickly. :-)

Sydney

On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 10:51 PM, The Richardsons <donsav2 at optonline.net>wrote:

>  On 9/17/2011 3:00 PM,
>
> Sarah Stierch
>
> wrote:
>
> The choices are really mediocre for the "neckline" women's section.  One of
> the photos is titled "Boobies.jpg."
>
>
> I saw that “boobies.jpg” was changed to “Cleavage (breasts).jpg” about four
> hours ago by Mattbuck. +1 for Gendergap!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
> That was the good news
> The bad news is that, from earlier posts about labiaplasty, it seemed that
> users wanted to remove the picture from the page, but that others put it
> back up. What I believe is that you had no right to take the picture off
> without consensus. Please excuse me if I missed something that would prove
> that there was consensus otherwise. Again, though, what troubles me is that
> SlimVirgin did get talked to rudely, being mockingly (in my opinion) called
> an “Administratrix” and being told to  “play by the rules you claim to
> enforce”. Also, you seem to be right in saying that the picture isn’t a
> “hypertrophy” (although I wouldn’t know) and I am pleased to see that a note
> was added early this morning UTC.
>
>     But my main problem is how we get to reach a consensus on this, by,
> which we certainly can, by questioning its “licensed medical image” status,
> pointing out that it is two different people, and pointing out that the
> labia minora are not hypertrophies.
>
>  --- RDW2210
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gendergap mailing list
> Gendergap at lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/gendergap/attachments/20110917/e56bdc9a/attachment.htm