[Gendergap] Resolution:Images of identifiable people

Fred Bauder fredbaud at fairpoint.net
Tue Sep 13 00:27:13 UTC 2011


>
>
> On 9/12/11 3:58 PM, Sarah Stierch wrote:
>>
>>
>> I'm not sure if we're ready to move it to meta yet, I do wish we had a
>> more private place to develop this. It's a rather sensitive topic for
>> folks.  Perhaps a google doc or...?
>
> 	To be honest, I think that working as publicly as possible is only
> good, in the long run, for what needs to happen. Transparency is super
> important.
>
> 	We've actually been having some interesting arguments about the use of
> Google docs within the office.
>
> 	One camp favors multiple edits at a time usability.
> 	The other camp believes that the use of a non-transparent medium is
> antithetical to the nature of the projects.
>
> 	(I fall in the second camp, personally).
>

I agree, but it can be a punishing process. The "right" place is the talk
pages of policy pages.

Fred




More information about the Gendergap mailing list