[Gendergap] Pregnancy article lead-image RFC
Sarah
slimvirgin at gmail.com
Wed Sep 7 02:12:41 UTC 2011
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 20:08, Fred Bauder <fredbaud at fairpoint.net> wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 19:27, <carolmooredc at verizon.net> wrote:
>>> Lots of us old hippie women are exhibitionists and I could advertise
>>> and
>>> get a few of us to pose. Then the young guys would have to discuss
>>> whether the 19 year old or 60 year old breast/nude/buttock etc. is more
>>> appropriate for an article.
>>>
>>> Hope that also engenders a good laugh....
>>>
>>> Carol in dc
>>>
>> It's actually a serious point, though. It would be great to provide
>> images for those articles that don't portray women the way certain men
>> want to see them portrayed. I recall the Body Shop did that a couple
>> of decades ago -- started using images of women that fell outside the
>> usual range that tended to be objectified (older, not thin, etc). They
>> produced some very good ads as a result. The difficulty for us would
>> be in finding those images, then in maintaining them on the pages.
>>
>> Sarah
>
> The concept of "being objectified" needs to be explained to the community
> and incorporated into our style guides. This has to make sense rather
> than being misunderstood.
>
> Fred
>
It's the kind of idea that people would become hostile towards,
because accepting how extensive the objectification is is part of
feminist consciousness. I see text and images on Wikipedia that are
very clear instances of it (in my view), but over the years I've
learned to keep my mouth shut about it.
Sarah
More information about the Gendergap
mailing list