[Gendergap] Wikipedia-specific suggestions (Re: Moderation?)

[KIZU Naoko]

On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 7:36 AM, SlimVirgin <slimvirgin at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 14:11, Fred Bauder <fredbaud at fairpoint.net> wrote:
>> Should we discuss such problems or should such posts have been rejected
>> by a moderator or the poster warned and required to revise their post?
>>
>> I have high toleration for disorder, but have found lately that wholesale
>> deletion has been useful when I get behind. The conversations here have
>> not been substantial or focused enough to command sustained attention.
>>
> I wouldn't mind seeing more moderation. I've just changed my
> preferences to digest mode, which means I'm going to miss things, but
> it was becoming too much and not focused enough.
>
> I wonder whether it would make sense to have two lists -- one for
> Wikipedia-specific suggestions, and another for the broader issues.

"Wikipedia-specific suggestions" seems better to be defined as English
Wikipedia suggestions. It would be a good practice of thought why
those questions came here, not to other and solid Wikipedia dedicated
fora, wikipedia at lists. wikimedia.org or its sister EnWP specific list.

Have you girls and guys never known those two lists? Or ...?


>
> Sarah
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gendergap mailing list
> Gendergap at lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
>



-- 
KIZU Naoko / 木津尚子
member of Wikimedians in Kansai  / 関西ウィキメディアユーザ会 http://kansai.wikimedia.jp