[Foundation-l] Controversial content software status

[Nathan]

On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 11:18 PM, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen <cimonavaro at gmail.com
> wrote:

> On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 4:44 PM, Nathan <nawrich at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 2:13 AM, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen
> > <cimonavaro at gmail.com>wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> Whew. We as a community figured that it would be insuperable from
> >> the get go, about 9 years ago. And Jimbo duely banned the first
> >> proposers. Glat to know the board is up to date, only 9 years late.
> >>
> >
> > "We as a community" don't agree on very much, and the image filter and
> > related issues certainly have a lot of people on all sides. So if you
> could
> > just speak for yourself, I don't know what the rest of the community
> would
> > think, but I'd appreciate it.
>
> This is just so wrong. There neve was ideas on this "from all sides". What
> there was to begin with, were very ham-handed attemps to try on maklng
> wikipedia more "family friendly". Once those were soundly spanked, as they
> needed to be; we got more sophisticated approaches that amounted to the
> same. And again the community -- not me -- rose up as one man and said
> a thorough *NO!!!* to the whole thing. Please don't try to personalize
> something
> where the minority is trying to lead the majority astray...
>
>
> --
> --
> Jussi-Ville Heiskanen, ~ [[User:Cimon Avaro]]
>

So what you're saying is, you feel confident that everyone agrees with you,
and thus perfectly comfortable speaking on behalf of the entire community?
I see.