[Foundation-l] Movement roles letter, Feb 2012

[Joan Goma]

> From: Florence Devouard <anthere9 at yahoo.com>
>
> > Regarding Amical my personal opinion is that they are highly flexible.
> > First they proposed a transnational chapter operating in 4 countries,
> later
> > they sent a mail to the board saying they would have a national chapter
> for
> > Andorra, later they proposed a sub-national chapter in Spain. Now
> probably
> > they can fit in the Partner Organization model.
> >
> > You know they are highly thankful to you because you find a place for
> them
> > to participate in Wikilovemsonuments.[1] I think Partner Organization can
> > be a solution for them like when you invented the therm ?Local area? They
> > were not interested in any name nor position in the list their only
> > interest where participating in Wikilovesmonuments with the same tools
> and
> > same freedom than any body else.
> >
> > They are not interested in any kind of exclusivity, they are not
> interested
> > in the name ?National Chapter?, their only interest is being able to
> > support and promote the Catalan projects with the same tools and same
> > freedom you have to promote French ones.
>
> I am surprised by your use of "they"
>

This is just an old trick to make you do this question and have opportunity
of saying that if you where so kind of accepting being a honorary member of
Amical then I could use “we”.