[Foundation-l] PG rating
John Vandenberg
jayvdb at gmail.com
Thu Sep 8 02:15:00 UTC 2011
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Risker <risker.wp at gmail.com> wrote:
> Many countries have different rating schemes for movies, television, video
> games, and other media.
Which rating systems would apply to our content?
i.e. does the Australian regulatory body have jurisdiction over Wikipedia?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_Classification_Board
Yes it does, if the Australian Communications and Media Authority
refers the websites to it.
repeat and rinse for each country.
> There are literally tens of thousands of pages on
> the English Wikipedia that would fall afoul of rating schemes of multiple
> countries, although they would vary significantly from country to country.
> ..
> But we already know that, so I wonder why you ask this?
Sure there are a lot of possible problems, but I am wondering if we
have any concrete examples for us to consider. It may inform debate
to talk about real content pages on a Wikipedia project which should
be rated, either by law or on a voluntary/best practice basis.
--
John Vandenberg
More information about the foundation-l
mailing list