[Foundation-l] Letter to the community on Controversial Content
jayen466 at yahoo.com
Tue Oct 11 15:42:11 UTC 2011
From: Fae <fae at wikimedia.org.uk>
> We could also just delete them, unless someone actually uses them in a sensible way in an article. :-)
> Kim Bruning
Not on Commons; being "objectionable" to some viewers and not being
currently in use does not make a potentially educational image out of
scope. I have seen many poorly worded deletion requests on Commons on
the basis of a potentially useable image being "orphaned" rather than
it being unrealistic to expect it to ever be used for an educational
Agree with Fae; Commons is a general image repository in its own right, serving a bigger audience than just the other Wikimedia projects.
So the fact is that Commons will contain controversial images – and that we have to curate them responsibly.
Someone on Meta has pointed out that Commons seems to list sexual image results for search terms like cucumber, electric toothbrushes or pearl necklace way higher than a corresponding Google search. See http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/commons-l/2011-October/006290.html
More information about the foundation-l