[Foundation-l] Interesting legal action

Thomas Morton morton.thomas at googlemail.com
Fri May 20 22:14:42 UTC 2011


Also; hard to see anyone suing you for communicating the info for the
purposes of supressing it :-)

Tom Morton

On 20 May 2011, at 23:08, Risker <risker.wp at gmail.com> wrote:

> On 20 May 2011 18:02, Fred Bauder <fredbaud at fairpoint.net> wrote:
>
>>> On 20 May 2011 22:47, Fred Bauder <fredbaud at fairpoint.net> wrote:
>>>> Please mail User:Oversight with any such instance you are aware of.
>>>
>>> That's not actually legal.
>>>
>>> --
>>> geni
>>>
>>
>> What on earth is illegal about assisting the project in avoiding
>> publishing defamatory information?
>>
>>
>
> What Geni means is that if he (as a UK resident) identified something that
> violated the superinjunction, emailing Oversight would be sufficient for him
> to violate the superinjunection.  I am not certain that is 100% correct, if
> he does not name any names, but I can understand that perspective.  As it
> is, there are plenty of non-UK citizens/residents watching the articles
> involved to address the situation, so generally speaking UK
> residents/citizens should not feel they are obliged to put themselves at
> risk.
>
> Risker/Anne
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l



More information about the foundation-l mailing list