[Foundation-l] Global ban - poetlister?

Jason donovan jdoe99d at gmail.com
Sat Jun 4 22:24:15 UTC 2011

On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 3:30 AM, phoebe ayers <phoebe.wiki at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 8:30 AM, David Gerard <dgerard at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 4 June 2011 15:42, MZMcBride <z at mzmcbride.com> wrote:
> >
> >> I think it's a fairly dangerous precedent to have the Wikimedia
> Foundation
> >> involved in making individual decisions about who can and can't edit.
> >
> >
> > They certainly can determine who can and can't use the servers they
> > are custodians of.
> Frankly, it's not just a question of who has the power to press the
> BANNED button; who at the WMF do you think should or has time to sit
> around and review the actions of every cross-project problematic user
> in every language and decide? We do need to have some sort of clear
> mechanism to make and review complaints, and there's simply not those
> processes (yet) on a global level. As both a community member and
> someone who needs to worry about WMF resources, I want to see a
> distributed and scalable process for this sort of thing, one that
> involves, serves, and is transparent to the community. If having WMF
> office actions to do global (b)locks is helpful or necessary,
> especially for these few totally bad actors, fine; but I don't
> personally see that as the starting point for a sustainable system. Do
> you?

Isn't this more or less what Mz McBride said earlier quoting you.

> However, as Sue stated earlier in this thread, the WMF is concerned
> about this issue, wants to help, and I think further ideas about the
> areas in which the WMF could help would be super, especially in
> conjunction with community efforts.

Let's hope the board can commission another study and then make the hard
decision to leave it to the community.


More information about the foundation-l mailing list