[Foundation-l] Questions about new Fellow

[whothis]

Nathan, I understand you don't know me, but can''t you see he is exactly the
same as me, an anonymous and uncounted associate, who is as much a
shareholder, auditor as I am. The only difference is I don't lead the
Movement, I supposedly am lead by anonymous unknowns like him.

E.

On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 11:12 PM, Nathan <nawrich at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 12:36 PM, MZMcBride <z at mzmcbride.com> wrote:
> > Achal Prabhala wrote:
> >> In all these capacities and more.
> >
> > 33
> >
> >> That's the spirit. And I've always felt that a waste is a terrible thing
> >> to mind.
> >
> > 81
> >
> > [links shortened]
> >> http://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?oldid=2284834#India_planning
> >> http://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?oldid=2284834#India_planning
> >
> > First link: 231
> > Second link: 285
> >
> >> Settle down, my friend...going around in circles will make us all dizzy.
> >
> > 72
> >
> >> Personally, I recommend half an hour of Pranayama
> >> (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pranayama) every morning: it makes one
> >> feel calm and loving.
> >
> > 140!
> >
> > Your commitment to openness and transparency is ready to be transferred
> to a
> > Twitter account. You'll have to work with Erik to make all of his
> openness
> > and transparency fit. (In all seriousness, thank you, Erik, for the
> > reports.)
> >
> > I don't know why anyone would be interested (in more than 500 characters)
> > about one of the biggest portions of Wikimedia's five-year plan (which
> you
> > didn't help write, I get it!). But your snide answers to legitimate
> > questions only serves to highlight the exact problems and concerns that
> most
> > people have been quietly observing in you. Good work.
> >
> > MZMcBride
> >
> >
>
>
> Honestly, I don't see how you could expect a better set of answers
> given your approach. You're not a prosecutor, and you have no right to
> interrogate him about whatever "improprieties" you and your supposedly
> like-minded (but anonymous and uncounted) associates perceive. You're
> also not a shareholder, an auditor, or in any other fashion entitled
> to receive polite replies to snide implications of corruption.
>
> Nathan
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>