[Foundation-l] "Terms of use" : Anglo-saxon copyright law and Anglo-saxon lawyers : a disgrace for Continental Europeans

[Ryan Kaldari]

Would you care to explain anything you're talking about?

I don't see anything in the Licensing section that mentions anything 
about U.S. copyright law. It says the content is licensed under the GFDL 
and CC-BY-SA, and the Attribution section just reflects the standard 
practices for those licenses. I don't see anything about how we're 
supposed to belittle and disgrace Europeans, but maybe I missed that part :)

Ryan Kaldari


On 12/12/11 8:14 AM, Teofilo wrote:
> Le 11 décembre 2011 19:02, MZMcBride<z at mzmcbride.com>  a écrit :
>> Hi.
>>
>> The "Terms of use" rewrite is starting to wind down. The current draft is
>> here:<https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Terms_of_use>.
>  From the point of view of Continental Europe, where creators enjoy
> advanced copyright laws which protect their attribution right, I think
> this implementation of the - creator belittling - US copyright law on
> Wikimedia projects is a disgrace. What the licensing section of this
> draft terms of use is saying is that the WMF simply disregards the
> attribution rights which are granted by law in their countries. It is
> humiliating.
>
> By the clever use of attribution licenses, there was a way to
> conciliate continental European laws and US or British laws. The WMF
> decides not to do so, and to stubbornly push the US-copyright law
> point of view. It is a pity.
>
> Perhaps the WMF should not have relied on a US lawyer alone. Perhaps a
> team associating a US lawyer with a continental Europe lawyer would
> have been better.
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l