[Foundation-l] Call for referendum

[Jussi-Ville Heiskanen]

On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 9:52 PM, Risker <risker.wp at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 20 August 2011 14:31, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen <cimonavaro at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I would like to make tiny procedural point before things go any
>> further, if I may, please don't let this stop the philosphical
>> distractions going in any way (though perhaps better suited in their
>> own thread).
>>
>> Since there is going to be such a short interval between the vote
>> concluding, and the results being announced, is it the presumption
>> that no due diligence needs to be adhered to with regards to vote
>> fraud, and sock-puppets are explicitly allowed to vote?
>>
>>
>
> No.
>
> Each individual may vote once, using a single eligible account of his or her
> choice.
>
> I do not understand why you would think that violating election rules would
> be okay if there was the possibility one wouldn't get caught. Isn't that
> like walking out of a store without paying for the television because the
> clerk just happened to step away from the till for a few minutes?
>
> If it requires more time to do due diligence, then it will take more time.
>

So why announce ridiculously unrealistic timeframe between the vote
concluding and the results being announced?



-- 
--
Jussi-Ville Heiskanen, ~ [[User:Cimon Avaro]]