[Foundation-l] Which pages to apply Flagged Protection to (Re: Renaming "Flagged Protections)
Rob Lanphier
robla at wikimedia.org
Fri May 28 00:51:13 UTC 2010
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 11:39 AM, James Heilman <jmh649 at gmail.com> wrote:
> I think the best way of rolling this out if it is possible would be to
> replace all semi protected articles with flagged protected or"double check"
> protected. If it works well we could than either add more pages or apply
> it
> to all pages.
>
Hi James,
I think it'd be good to have a conversation on this talk page about the
subject of where to roll this out to:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Flagged_protection_and_patrolled_revisions/Trial
There's already been a little bit of discussion there, and should probably
be more.
Note that this page:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Flagged_protection_and_patrolled_revisions/Trial
...has a section titled "Initial article count limits". We're planning on
putting an upper bound of 2000 articles, so putting all semi-protected
articles under the new regime is probably off the table. Just speaking for
myself as a community member, it seems smart to limit this to pages that
would qualify for semi-protection. It would be very appropriate to add a
policy sec
Speaking as a member of WMF, we think it's really important that the
community has policies ready when this rolls out, so thank you for
(re)starting the conversation.
Rob
More information about the foundation-l
mailing list