[Foundation-l] Spectrum of views (was Re: Sexual Imagery on Commons: where the discussion is happening)

Noein pronoein at gmail.com
Tue May 11 18:58:47 UTC 2010


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 11/05/2010 12:44, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> I would propose that the reason we are subject to such a _small_
> amount of complaint about our content is that much of the world
> understands that what Wikipedia does is —in a sense— deeply subversive
> and not at all compatible with "ideas which must be suppressed".  This
> fact gets a lot of names, some call it a "liberal bias" though I don't
> think that is quite accurate.  But there very much is a bias— a
> pro-flow-of-information bias.  We don't always realize we have it, but
> I don't think we deny it when we do.

And there is a general consensus here about those libertarian views?
I'm impressed. Sorry to repetitively check the ethical temperature of
the community, but I come from social horizons where it's not only not
natural, but generates hatred. I never could talk about libertarian
ideas outside of one or two family members and two or three friends.
Here, it seems the norm, and I simply can't believe it.
As I said before, Wikipedia acted like a magnet on me. I'm wondering if
it's uniting all the (internet connected) libertarian of the world. In
this case I'm surprised that it didn't receive more serious attacks from
the establishment.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJL6ajnAAoJEHCAuDvx9Z6LxQEIAOkmwi+7o3PyBbxOXDHrfTyT
5+OemY+gw4AEejtDq/ZV6jI3ngD/APehLY/slGWsiwxbOlhH3YPy1ELPdwOQdX75
YKyjprccvuLPgY+vkUTD4osn12hZWH0g83kPRjjvx4CeBiGL1kvxKDpU1qXDyhNX
sboxxSwXqMI9gVH787Wd03TWP7EXxdwPkt7TEc6M1oMXug4RhpUB9jdUr1ikO5Ni
09ws/S0zIHiVCd88BTfYxaG0JJYbt/vmSG0232Sz5w+CjXtVfigch6KHYVKrYxAV
XdXTPwvd0D63tXNBJ/lsZ9AjGk28Ktdyum9T7RROFXlQckBk3Fi7m9o57F0Fomk=
=IP4R
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the foundation-l mailing list