[Foundation-l] Jimbo's Sexual Image Deletions

[Andreas Kolbe]

> Andreas Kolbe wrote:
>> --- On Sat, 8/5/10, Tomasz Ganicz <polimerek at gmail.com> wrote:
>>   
>>> Then another idea is to keep on Commons only those pictures which are
>>> non-controversial and suggest local project to keep their controversial 
>>> pictures local? For example en Wikipedia keeps fair use pictures locally 
>>> and it is OK. If for example nudity pictures is not a problem for Danish or > French or Svedish Wikipedias - they can keep them locally... and the> en-Wikipedia which is driven by anglo-saxon taboo of nudity can get rid of them...
>>>     
>>
>> This is an elegant idea that might be worth pursuing, at least as >> an interim solution. Projects could be given ample warning that >> certain media files will be deleted at such and such a date, and >> that if any project is interested in them, they should transfer >> them to their own project space. >> Andreas
>
>
>   
> Without even commenting the idea itself, I have to ask:
> What in this context would you consider "ample
> warning"? One year, two years, more, less?
> Yours,> Jussi-Ville Heiskanen
2 months. Andreas