[Foundation-l] A Board member's perspective

geni geniice at gmail.com
Sun May 9 02:07:21 UTC 2010


On 9 May 2010 01:09, David Gerard <dgerard at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 9 May 2010 01:04, Noein <pronoein at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 08/05/2010 20:52, Stuart West wrote:
>
>>> (1) There were some bad actors at work (e.g. hardcore pornography distributors taking advantage of our open culture to get free anonymous hosting).  (2) As a community (including the Board), we debated the issue too long and failed to drive closure and implement.  (3) There are complex issues around _some_ of the content that is in a gray area and those complexities distracted us from dealing with the clearer cut cases.
>
>> In order to help us understand better the situation, can you refer
>> concrete examples of 1 and a link to the discussion mentioned in 2?
>
>
> Indeed. (1) is a definite [citation needed].
>
>
> - d.
>

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Toyslove_sybian_in_action_kobe_lee.OGG
in particular the last 20 seconds.


-- 
geni



More information about the foundation-l mailing list