[Foundation-l] Creative Commons publishes report on defining "Non-commercial"

[wiki-lists at phizz.demon.co.uk]

Hay (Husky) wrote:
> 
> That's why it's so important, for projects like ours, to use a
> license such as BY-SA that it usable by anyone, at anytime, for any
> purpose without that ambiguity.
> 

Except that it is not, the SA license ghettoizes the work just as an NC
licenses does. The only difference is that they build different walls.

You can't combine a CC-BY work with a CC-BY-SA work without either
imposing a SA limitation on the CC-BY work, or removing the SA
limitation on the CC-BY-SA work. Which is no different to that of
someone combining CC-BY-NC-SA license with a CC-BY-SA license.