[Foundation-l] Third-party GFDL text irrevocably incompatible with Wikipedia as of August 1
Ray Saintonge
saintonge at telus.net
Thu May 28 08:28:56 UTC 2009
Samuel Klein wrote:
> Ray Saintonge wrote:
>
>> Newyorkbrad (Wikipedia) wrote:
>>
>>> The point I was making is that I expect people will continue importing
>>> and exporting as per past practice with no attention given to the
>>> issue and few people caring. From a legal point of view that's not
>>> optimal, but I think it's highly likely.
>>>
>> That's a reasonable expectation. People who are not intimately involved
>> with the arcana of licensing will just turn off and ignore the
>> distinctions. Others may just see the rush to get everyone changed the
>> short period between WMF's adoption of this switch and the deadline date
>> as an attempt by the big kid on the block to push its policies on others.
>>
> We should certainly take care not to push anyone. I would be
> delighted to see sites that do not wish to change sticking with the
> GFDL - that's excellent, and it is a great license for people who use
> it intentionally. What I mind is sites realizing in half a year the
> implications of Wikimedia's switch, and despising the effect it has
> had on them, if they chose the GFDL (and perhaps put up with some of
> its quirks) simply for WP compatibility.
>
As much as anything else it is the short time frame that will look
pushy. Wikipedia went through a lot of debate *before* the switch, and
the internal debates of others should not matter less. As I understand
what is being said they will still be able to import from WMF projects;
that would be more important to them than whether WMF projects import
from them. To say that they chose GFDL for WP compatibility may not be
a sustainable presumption in most cases. I doubt if many of them went
through a lot of legal analysis before choosing a licence; an
it's-as-good-as-anything attitude may very well have prevailed. If WMF
projects can't copy from them it will more likely enhance the uniqueness
of their project, a potentially positive result in a competitive market.
Ec
More information about the foundation-l
mailing list