[Foundation-l] Wikipedia is not the Kama Sutra, was Re: commons and freely licensed sexual imagery

[Birgitte SB]

--- On Fri, 5/15/09, Aryeh Gregor <Simetrical+wikilist at gmail.com> wrote:

> From: Aryeh Gregor <Simetrical+wikilist at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] Wikipedia is not the Kama Sutra, was Re: commons  and freely licensed sexual imagery
> To: "Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List" <foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org>
> Date: Friday, May 15, 2009, 1:26 PM
> On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 9:33 AM,
> Birgitte SB <birgitte_sb at yahoo.com>
> wrote:
> > Your really didn't address my question.  Why do you
> think WMF resources are best used to create and support a
> mirror for people who are disgusted by sexuality rather than
> making easier for third-parties to create mirrors for *any*
> of different of audiences in the world that find various
> different things unacceptable?
> 
> I don't, and I'm not sure why you think I do.  I
> explicitly stated
> that I favored a categorization system whereby users can
> filter out
> whatever content they personally find objectionable, and
> display
> whatever they don't.  I also never said WMF resources
> should be spent
> on anything, and I definitely don't support creating entire
> mirrors
> just for the sake of image content when you could just hide
> or display
> the images inline.  So I'm not sure what you mean at
> all.


Well you now snipped it all, but someone suggested creating mirror under a different domain name for schools.  I replied to that saying how I thought resources were best spent.  Then you replied to me.  
 
If you weren't replying to me to disagree with me, I have no idea what you intended.  But I thought disagreement with me was a pretty safe assumption from the tone of your message.


Birgitte SB