[Foundation-l] Proposed revised attribution language

Thomas Dalton thomas.dalton at gmail.com
Sat Mar 14 13:36:42 UTC 2009

2009/3/14 Jussi-Ville Heiskanen
> I think you fail at logic.
> You could not have two mirrors linking to each others with
> neither listing the authors, if the first one to mirror was
> compliant with the CC-BY-SA. Posit the first mirror complied with
> and required compliance of that license. It would have to
> attribute in a reasonable form and require attribution in a
> reasonable form from those taking content from it. If the site
> copying from it, did not attribute in a reasonable form, it
> could in no way be considered compliant. Logic 101.

I think you misunderstand what we're discussing here. We're talking
about what forms of attribution are acceptable for people using our
content under CC-BY-SA. We're saying that attribution by URL is
acceptable for people using the content under CC-BY-SA.

More information about the foundation-l mailing list