[Foundation-l] About that "sue and be damned" to the National Portrait Gallery ...

[Tris Thomas]

Seconded.

On 11/07/2009 19:52, Rjd0060 wrote:
> Perhaps everybody should take that advice.  I find it mildly amusing that
> suddenly we have a list full of legal experts.  Can we let those relevant
> people do what the will now and stop speculating/guessing/etc. here and
> elsewhere?
>
> ---
> Rjd0060
> rjd0060.wiki at gmail.com
>
>
> On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 2:49 PM, Thomas Dalton<thomas.dalton at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>    
>> 2009/7/11 geni<geniice at gmail.com>:
>>      
>>> The case is under English and welsh law. For solid legal reasons the
>>> NPG will be willing to make a reasonable settlement.
>>>
>>> Since we know that the NPG are not completely stupid and English law
>>> in any case lacks statutory damages it would seem to be somewhat
>>> improbable that any course of action we can take can make them insist
>>> on an unreasonable settlement.
>>>        
>> You can't know that and it's not your place to guess. Just stay out of
>> it unless Derrick asks for your help.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> foundation-l mailing list
>> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>>
>>      
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>