[Foundation-l] About that "sue and be damned" to the National Portrait Gallery ...

[Rjd0060]

Perhaps everybody should take that advice.  I find it mildly amusing that
suddenly we have a list full of legal experts.  Can we let those relevant
people do what the will now and stop speculating/guessing/etc. here and
elsewhere?

---
Rjd0060
rjd0060.wiki at gmail.com


On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 2:49 PM, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dalton at gmail.com>wrote:

> 2009/7/11 geni <geniice at gmail.com>:
> > The case is under English and welsh law. For solid legal reasons the
> > NPG will be willing to make a reasonable settlement.
> >
> > Since we know that the NPG are not completely stupid and English law
> > in any case lacks statutory damages it would seem to be somewhat
> > improbable that any course of action we can take can make them insist
> > on an unreasonable settlement.
>
> You can't know that and it's not your place to guess. Just stay out of
> it unless Derrick asks for your help.
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>