[Foundation-l] Sexual Content on Wikimedia

[Marco Chiesa]

On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 4:21 PM, geni <geniice a gmail.com> wrote:

>
> Not really. For example our need for portraits of people we have
> articles on means that we should have several hundred thousand images
> of faces.
>
> In addition most parts of the human anatomy don't have the same
> providence issues.
>
> Oh yeah, we humans tend to use faces as the way to recognise different
people... maybe genitalia are appropriate to distinguish between porn actors
;) (please do not take this sentence as an incentive to upload these kind of
images, I think the set we have already covers all our encyclopedic needs)

Cruccone