[Foundation-l] Elections in the pontic wikipedia
swatjester at gmail.com
Tue Jan 27 19:22:58 UTC 2009
This indeed. Good for them for dealing with these issues in advance
rather than waiting until the need for a crat is critical.
On Jan 27, 2009, at 1:03 PM, Muhammad Alsebaey wrote:
> +1 on them having their own crat and admins since they were
> approved, what
> possible harm could that have? they can always self-correct as the
> gets bigger is the choices are not optimum.
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 8:13 AM, Philippe|Wiki <philippe.wiki at gmail.com
>> While we can always learn from best practices, I firmly believe it's
>> best to leave local governance to local communities.
>> If they want to have admins and crats, and have set up an election
>> system with appropriate controls and a system of checks and balances,
>> good for them.
>> philippe.wiki at gmail.com
>> On Jan 27, 2009, at 9:38 AM, Huib Laurens wrote:
>>> why should a wiki have a bureaucrat before it is created?
>>> A lot of small wikis doesn't have a crat and stewards will do the
>>> The same for admins, why not keep the test admins. I don't see why
>>> is important to have admins before a wiki is created or has a
>>> Best regards,
>>> Leave nothing but footprints, take nothing but pictures
>>> foundation-l mailing list
>>> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
>>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>> foundation-l mailing list
>> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/
> Best Regards,
> Muhammad Alsebaey
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
More information about the foundation-l