[Foundation-l] Elections in the pontic wikipedia

[Muhammad Alsebaey]

+1 on them having their own crat and admins since they were approved, what
possible harm could that have? they can always self-correct as the community
gets bigger is the choices are not optimum.

On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 8:13 AM, Philippe|Wiki <philippe.wiki at gmail.com>wrote:

> While we can always learn from best practices, I firmly believe it's
> best to leave local governance to local communities.
>
> If they want to have admins and crats, and have set up an election
> system with appropriate controls and a system of checks and balances,
> good for them.
>
>
> __________________
> Philippe|Wiki
> philippe.wiki at gmail.com
>
> [[en:User:Philippe]]
>
>
>
>
> On Jan 27, 2009, at 9:38 AM, Huib Laurens wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > why should a wiki have a bureaucrat before it is created?
> >
> > A lot of small wikis doesn't have a crat and stewards will do the job.
> >
> > The same for admins, why not keep the test admins. I don't see why it
> > is important to have admins before a wiki is created or has a
> > comnunety.
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> >
> > --
> > Leave nothing but footprints, take nothing but pictures
> >
> > http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:SterkeBak
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > foundation-l mailing list
> > foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>



-- 
Best Regards,
Muhammad Alsebaey