wikimail at inbox.org
Thu Jan 22 19:59:59 UTC 2009
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 2:54 PM, geni <geniice at gmail.com> wrote:
> 2009/1/22 Anthony <wikimail at inbox.org>:
> > What about the GFDL 1.2 is so bad that it is unusable? Clean up the
> > tracking, add five names next to each article title, add a copyright
> > statement at the bottom of each article, turn on the "real name"
> > and it seems like you could bring Wikipedia into compliance. You might
> > to forego dreams of a print edition, but frankly that doesn't seem very
> > effective anyway. You could probably build a hand powered e-reader for
> > than the cost of printing all of Wikipedia - if not today than in the not
> > too distant future.
> Wikipedia is in compliance with the GFDL.
So why can't a fork be in compliance with the GFDL? You said that "The GFDL
1.2 license is so bad that any fork would still be looking to use CC just in
a slightly more legal way." What do you mean by this?
More information about the foundation-l