[Foundation-l] Board resolutions (chapters)

[Andrew Whitworth]

On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 10:15 AM, Andre Engels <andreengels at gmail.com> wrote:
> That doesn't change my point, it's just a matter of scale... Suppose
> there's a chapter in Georgia, and one for Kentucky and Tennessee. Then
> some people come around and start on a chapter for the southeast.
> That's going to be a quite strange assortment of states they're going
> to represent.

So it's a problem if a chapters geographical area is "strange"? Or
maybe the biggest concern is that a chapter may be named in such a way
that's confusing to non-members? If these are our biggest problems
concerning the hypothetical development of subnational chapters, then
I am relieved. If we are lucky enough to have 4 active chapters in the
south east region of the USA, then this is quite a good problem to
have!

--Andrew Whitworth