[Foundation-l] transparency or translucency?

[Brian]

I believe the point that Jimbo is making (i will certainly be corrected if
wrong :-) is that there is no externally imposed hierarchy. The wiki really
did start as a tabula rasa, and all discussions of its hierarchy can be
found in its pages.

On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 1:23 PM, James Rigg <jamesrigg1974 at googlemail.com>wrote:

> On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 6:31 PM, Jimmy Wales <jwales at wikia-inc.com> wrote:
> > James Rigg wrote:
> >> Thanks geni.
> >>
> >> So, to put it crudely, the talk of full transparency and lack of
> >> hierarchy is now viewed as just naive idealism that existed at the
> >> start of the project, and which has now been abandoned?
> >
> > No, not at all.
> >
> >
>
> But there isn't full transparency, and there is a hierarchy.
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>



-- 
You have successfully failed!