[Foundation-l] Re-licensing

[Michael Bimmler]

On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 7:46 PM, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dalton at gmail.com> wrote:
> 2009/2/1 Mike Godwin <mgodwin at wikimedia.org>:
>>
>> Anthony writes:
>>
>>>> Actually, the difference is quite relevant in a courtroom,
>>>> especially when
>>>> dealing with constitutional issues.  That's why I find it nearly
>>>> impossible
>>>> to believe that Mike doesn't understand this.  How in the world can
>>>> you
>>>> defend people's constitutional rights if you think they're made up
>>>> out of
>>>> nowhere?  Why defend free speech if it's just a couple words some
>>>> guys made
>>>> up and wrote down on paper?  The very nature of the legal system in
>>>> the
>>>> United States of America is based upon natural rights.  "We hold
>>>> these
>>>> truths to be self-evident".  Self-evident.  Not created by
>>>> congressmen.
>>
>> It is a common mistake... [snip]
>
> I'm confused... why have you sent a reply (twice) to an off-topic
> thread that died out over a week ago? Or did these get stuck in the
> moderation system somehow? (In which case - Mods: if you don't keep up
> to date with moderation, just delete emails that are no longer
> relevant [and let the author know], it rarely serves much purpose
> posting them a week late.)

As I explained to Mike already: It must have been a technical problem
-- his mails are not and were never moderated.

Michael



-- 
Michael Bimmler
mbimmler at gmail.com