[Foundation-l] The license situation

Jussi-Ville Heiskanen cimonavaro at gmail.com
Sun Oct 19 23:47:48 UTC 2008


Jussi-Ville Heiskanen wrote:
> Angela wrote:
>> On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 10:30 PM, Anthony <wikimail at inbox.org> wrote:
>>   
>>> Which leads me to another question.  Who controls this definition?
>>> http://freedomdefined.org/History gives a bit of the history, but I couldn't
>>> find anything about the current situation.
>>>     
>>
>> It's based on community consensus. See
>> http://freedomdefined.org/Authoring_process
>>
>> Angela
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>     

Sorry, Angela, but community consensus is one incredibly
silly way to describe your little coteries bit of will formation.

I am sorry, but the only appropriate response here is
out loud laughter. Please do not promote any freedomdefined
text on this mailing list as a "community" effort. That really
makes scotsmen blush. (And yes, that goes double for Erik too.)


Yours,

Jussi-Ville Heiskanen







More information about the foundation-l mailing list