[Foundation-l] On Arabic and sub-language proposals.
Delirium
delirium at hackish.org
Thu Oct 9 02:19:50 UTC 2008
Mark Williamson wrote:
> A good, comprehensive study is needed (and probably already exists) to
> better classify the varieties of Arabic, because SIL has done a
> piss-poor job. It's shameful, considering just how many people speak
> one or another variety of Arabic.
>
It does exist, but the problem is that dozens of such studies exist,
arriving at different results. =] There is also disagreement over the
extent to which it even makes sense to classify Arabic into distinct
varieties, given the complex varieties of diglossia (to the point of
"multiglossia"), continuums along multiple axes of variation, and
discrepancies between speakers' reported dialect/language and actual
grammatical features.
A decent survey can be found in the editor's introduction to the
collection _Understanding Arabic_ (1996, ed. A. Elgibali, ISBN
9774243722), and in more details in some of the papers therein.
Of course, I'm no expert in the field; have just read a small amount of
what's written by people who are. It's a complex enough area that it's
basically an entire field of research.
-Mark
More information about the foundation-l
mailing list