[Foundation-l] GFDL 1.3 Release

[Nathan]

Seriously - why do we have to yoke ourselves to yet another external
organization? Clearly the binding association with the FSF has presented a
number of problems and limitations - wouldn't it be preferable to have
control of the terms, and write in compatibility with the licenses we'd like
to accomodate?

Nathan

On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 9:35 AM, Nikola Smolenski <smolensk at eunet.yu> wrote:

> >> On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 1:49 PM, geni <geniice at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> 2)It's taken years to get the FSF to agree to let us get around one
> >>> set of compatibility problems. Switching to FAL means we may end up in
> >>> the same situation with a different organisation
>
> Obvious solution to this problem is the WFDL - Wikimedia Free Document
> License!
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>